Lyubin P., Berdnik S., Lyubarsky D. River zooplankton communities of Naberezhnye Chelny // Principy èkologii. 2019. № 3. P. 40‒49. DOI: 10.15393/j1.art.2019.8862


Issue № 3

Original research

pdf-version

River zooplankton communities of Naberezhnye Chelny

Lyubin
   Pavel Anatolyevich
PhD, Research Institute for Problems of Ecology and Mineral Wealth Use of Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, plubin@mail.ru
Berdnik
   Sergey Vladimirovich
Research Institute for Problems of Ecology and Mineral Wealth Use of Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, svberdnik@mail.ru
Lyubarsky
   Dmitry Sergeevich
Research Institute for Problems of Ecology and Mineral Wealth Use of Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, lds57@mail.ru
Keywords:
zooplankton
community
Naberezhnye Chelny
Chelna
Melekeska
cluster analysis
saprobity index
trophic index
assessment of self-purification level
Summary: In September 2018, comprehensive hydrobiological studies were carried out in the water bodies of Naberezhnye Chelny in order to determine the current state of the Chelna and Melekeska rivers. The analysis of the state of zooplankton communities showed a generally favourable picture. The trophic level corresponds to α- and β-oligotrophic waters. The saprobity index showed that most of the surveyed areas can be attributed to the β-mesosaprobic zone of moderately polluted waters. At the same time, there are also areas that can be attributed to the oligosaprobic zone – clean waters. Self-purification of water by zooplankters in the Melekeska River can be characterized as active, and in the Chelna River - as weakened.

© Petrozavodsk State University

Received on: 13 March 2019
Published on: 06 October 2019

References

Chislenko L. L. Nomograms for determining the weight of aquatic organisms in terms of body size and shape (marine mesobenthos and plankton). L.: Nauka, 1968. 108 p.

Denisenko S. G. Shannon information measure and its application in assessments of biodiversity (on the example of marine zoobenthos), Morskie bespozvonochnye Arktiki, Antarktiki i Subantarktiki. Vyp. 56 (64). SPb., 2006. P. 35–46.

Derevenskaya O. Y., Umyarova R. M. Zooplankton as an indicator of river ecological condition, International Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 14567–14574.

Determinant of freshwater invertebrates of the European part of the USSR (plankton and benthos), Otv. red. L. A. Kutikova, Ya. I. Starobogatov. L.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1977. 511 p.

Determinant of zooplankton and zoobenthos of freshwaters of European Russia. Volume 1. Zooplankton, Red. V. R. Alekseev, P. Ya. Calolihin. M.: Tovarischestvo nauchnyh izdaniy KMK, 2010. 495 p.

GOST 14.1.3.07-82. Nature protection. Hydrosphere. Water qualitycontrol rules in reservoires and stream flows. M., 1982. 10 p.

Gorshkova A. T. Assessment of the level of self-purification of Kaban lakes by analyzing the zooplankton complex, Georesursy. 2012. No. 7 (49). P. 29–32.

Gorshkova A. T. Spatial analysis of the biological potential of the stability of aquatic ecosystems (on the example of surface waters of the Republic of Tatarstan): Avtoref. dip. ... kand. geogr. nauk. Yaroslavl', 2003. 24 p.

Kitaev S. P. Ecological bases of biological productivity of lakes of different natural zones. M.: Nauka, 1984. 207 p.

Krylov A. V. Zooplankton of lowland small rivers in a changing environment: Avtoref. dip. ... d-ra biol. nauk. M.: MGU, 2003. 41 p.

Krylov A. V. Zooplankton of lowland small rivers. M.: Nauka, 2005. 263 p.

Lyubarskiy E. L. To the methodology of express qualification and comparison of descriptions of phytocenoses, Kolichestvennye metody analiza rastitel'nosti. Ufa: BFAN SSSR, 1974. P. 123–125.

Manual on methods of hydrobiological analysis of surface waters and bottom sediments, Pod red. V. A. Abakumova. L.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1983. 239 p.

Manushin I. E. The average mass of an individual as an indicator of the rate of substance turnover in populations of aquatic ectothermic animals, Materialy X nauch. seminara «Chteniya pamyati K. M. Deryugina». SPb.: ZAO «KopiServis», 2008. P. 29–34.

Methodical recommendations for the collection and processing of materials in hydrobiological research on freshwater reservoirs. Zooplankton and its products, Red. G. G. Vinberg, G. M. Lavrent'eva. L.: GosNIORH, 1982. 34 p.

Pantle F., Buck H. Die biologische Überwachung der Gewasser und die Darstellung der Ergebnisse, Gas- und Wasserfach. 1955. Bd 96. No. 18. P. 604–620.

Risk assessment of anthropogenic impact of priority pollutants on land surface waters. M.: Meteoagentstvo Rosgidrometa, 2006. 23 p.

Shakirova F. M. Govorkova L. K. Anohina O. K. The current state of the Nizhnekamsk reservoir and the possibility of rational development of its fish resources, Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2013. T. 15. No. 3 (1). P. 518–527.

Shannon P. V., Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana (Illinois): Univ. of Illinois Press, 1963. 345 r.

Sladecek V. The future of the saprobity system, Hydrobiologia. 1965. Vol. 25. I. 3-4. P. 518–537.

Sladeček V. System of water quality from the biological point of view, Arch. Hydrobiol., Beihefz., Ergebnisse der Limnol. 1973. Bd 7. P. 1–218.

Sokolova K. N. Zooplankton in ponds of the Kuibishev farm, Trudy Tatarskogo otd. VNIORH. 1954. Vyp. 7. P. 50–59.

Displays: 2033; Downloads: 408;