| Issue № 1 |
Original research |
pdf-version |
Indication of the ecological status of urban soils based on some chemical and microbiological indicators (on the example of Astrakhan)
| Parkhomenko Anna Nikolaevna | Ph.D., Astrakhan State Technical University, 16, Tatishchev st., Astrakhan, 414025, Russia, parhoman@mail.ru |
|
Keywords: urban soils soil assessment biological activity enzyme activity ecological state |
Summary: The aim of the research was to determine the ecological status of soils in the industrial, residential and recreational areas of the Astrakhan city. As a result, biological and enzymatic activity of the studied soil samples was studied. Soils in the territory of LUKOIL-NVNP oil depot No. 5 showed low biological activity. Low enzymatic activity was shown by soils of the residential area. Using the obtained results, we calculated an integral indicator of the biological state of the studied soils based on the complex of 15 microbiological and biochemical parameters. The maximum values of the integral indicator of biological state (IIBS) of soil were marked for soils of recreational area, minimal - for soils of industrial area (tank farm No. 5 OOO «LUKOIL-NWNP»). They were 81,2% and 26,2 %, respectively. For data processing and analysis we used clustering based on a set of chemical and microbiological indicators. As a result, 3 clusters were formed. Minimum differences in chemical and microbiological parameters were established for soils selected in the territory of LUKOIL-NVNP oil depot No. 5. The second cluster was formed by the soils of the residential area and Confectionary plant «Karon», the third - by the soils selected in the recreational area of the city. It was also established that microbiological indicators were most applicable to determine the ecological state of urban soils in the industrial and residential areas compared to biochemical ones. The obtained results show that the ecological status of soils in the industrial, residential zone and V.I. Lenin Park can be characterized as highly dangerous by the values of integral indicators. © Petrozavodsk State University |
Received on: 15 July 2019 Published on: 12 March 2020 | |
References
Atlas R. M. Microbial hydrocarbon degradation – bioremediation of oil spills, J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 1991. Vol. 52. P. 149–156.
Bahrampour T., Moghanlo Sarvi V. Evaluation of soil biological activity after soil contaminating by crude oil, International Journal of Agriculture: Research and Review. 2012. Vol. 2 (6). R. 671–679.
Belova M. Yu. Tihomirova E. I. Abrosimova O. V. Improvement of ecological monitoring of urban soils on biological indicators taking into account gully-beam network, Nauchnye trudy nacional'nogo parka «Hvalynskiy». 2017. Vyp. 9. P. 94–99.
Dobrovol'skiy G. V. Chernov I. Yu. The role of soil in the formation and conservation of biological diversity. M.: Tovarischestvo nauchnyh izdaniy KMK, 2011. 273 p.
Elliott G. Effects of inhibitors of microbial activity on urea hydrolysis and nitrification in a soilless potting medium, Horticulture. 2007. No. 3. R. 23–27.
Fedorec N. G. Medvedeva M. V. Methods of research of soils of urban territories. Petrozavodsk: Karel'skiy nauchnyy centr RAN, 2009. 84 p.
Galaktionova L. V. Suzdaleva A. V. Assessment of the soil cover of the urbanized territories by the methods of biodiagnostic, Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2017. No. 4. P. 171.
Haziev F. H. Methods of soil enzimology. M.: Nauka, 2005. 252 p.
Haziev F. H. Structural and functional connection of biodiversity ground ecosystems with soils, Ekobioteh. 2019. T. 2. No. 1. P. 19–35. DOI 10.31163/2618-964X-2019-2-1-19-35
Kazeev K. Sh. Kolesnikov S. I. Biodiagnostics of soils: the methodology and research methods. Rostov n/D: Izd-vo Yuzhnogo federal'nogo un-ta, 2012. 260 p.
Kireeva N. A. Vodop'yanov V. V. Miftahova A. M. Biological activity of oil contaminated soils. Ufa: Gilem, 2001. 376 p.
Kolesnikov S. I. Kazeev K. Sh. Denisova T. V. Methods to evaluate the effectiveness of remediation of soils contaminated with oil and oil products by biological indicators, Inzhenernyy vestnik Dona. 2013. T. 26. No. 3 (26). P. 51.
Korchagin A. A. Mazirov M. A. Shushkevich N. I. Soil fisics: laboratory workshop. Vladimir: Izd-vo Vladim. gop. un-ta, 2011. 99 p.
Korikova N. O. Gusakova N. V. Petrov V. V. Assessment of environmental status of soils of urban areas on the basis of indicators of biological activity (on the example of Taganrog), Izvestiya vuzov. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Estestvennye nauki. 2016. No. 4. P. 87–91. DOI: 10.18522/0321-3005-2016-4-87-91
Lehmann A., Stahr K. Nature and Significance of Anthropogenic Urban Soils, J. of Soils & Sediments. 2007. Vol. 7(4). P. 247–260.
Motuzova G. V. Bezuglova O. S. Environmental monitoring of soils. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt: Gaudeamus, 2007. 237 p.
Netrusov A. I. Workshop on microbiology. M.: Akademiya, 2005. 608 p.
Obire O., Anyanwu E. C. Impact of various concentrations of crude oil on fungal populations of soil, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2009. No. 6. P. 211–218.
Parhomenko A. N. About necessity of microbiological diagnostics of the soils experienced to anthropogenic impact, Yug Rossii: ekologiya, razvitie. 2010. No. 4. P. 88–91.
Parhomenko A. N. Ecological and biological properties of soils of the Astrakhan region in the conditions of anthropogenic impact, Izvestiya vuzov. Prikladnaya himiya i biotehnologiya. 2018. T. 8. No. 1. P. 129–134. DOI: 10.21285/2227-2925-2018-8-1-129-134
Parhomenko A. N. Vliyanie zagryazneniya nefteproduktami i seroy na mikrofloru pochv aridnoy zony (na primere Astrahanskoy oblasti): Dip. … kand. biol. nauk. Ufa, 2011. 181 p.
Ruchin A. B. Mescheryakov V. V. Spiridonov S. N. Urboekology for biologists. M.: KolosS, 2009. 195 p.
Soils. Soil sampling. M.: Standartinform, 2008. 6 p.
© 2011 - 2024
Petrozavodsk State University
technical support - RCNIT
The editor-in-chief - Andrey Korosov
ecopri@petrsu.ru