Popov S. Elements of meta-community structure of birds on the border of South taiga and forest-steppe of Trans-Urals (Russia): the effect of the environment gradient, spatial processes and interspecific competition // Principy èkologii. 2018. № 4. P. 97‒119. DOI: 10.15393/j1.art.2018.7662

Issue № 4

Original research


Elements of meta-community structure of birds on the border of South taiga and forest-steppe of Trans-Urals (Russia): the effect of the environment gradient, spatial processes and interspecific competition

Laboratory of Environmental Studies, mail@ecology-lab.com
bird communities
spatial structure of bird population
Summary: To identify the general principles of the assembly of natural communities is a fundamental issue of community ecology. To date, four paradigms have been formulated, within the framework of which the structure of meta-community and its providing factors are studied. Among the most important processes influencing the meta-community structure several processes are emphasized. These are random processes, those determined by the environment and those determined by biotic interactions. In the article we discuss the role of ecological gradients, non-environmental spatial processes and interspecific competition in the formation of bird communities on the border of taiga and steppe of Trans-Urals. From 2000 to 2011 we collected the information on the species composition of nesting birds of 17 sites. The meta-community structure was described using the element analysis method of the meta-community structure - EMS. To give accent to the main environmental gradients PCA method was used. To assess the impact of non-environmental spatial processes the correlation analysis of the similarity of the species composition of the sites and the distance between these sites was conducted. The role of competition was studied by comparing the variance of differences in body size of birds both within definite sites and within the regional species pool. For the statistical verification of a hypothesis the observed indices were compared with random ones calculated using the fixed null model (FF). The leading process of the formation of the structure of the birds’ meta-community on the border of taiga and forest-steppe of Trans-Urals is species sorting along ecological gradients. The structure of the meta-community of birds in the studied area within the sites least modified by anthropogenic activity corresponds to the Gleason gradient. The Gleason meta-community structure correlates well with the main ecological gradient. Community nesting is not revealed. The hypothesis about the role of interspecific competition is not confirmed. Minimal differences in body size of birds were not revealed. For the orders of Passeriformes and Falconiformes body size aggregation is characteristic. The role of spatial processes in the formation of the bird population is not significant. The correlation between the similarity of the species composition and the distance between the sites is not significant.

© Petrozavodsk State University

Reviewer: A. Beljachenko
Received on: 11 July 2018
Published on: 24 December 2018


Bert D. G. A multiscale analysis of Nested Species subsets of forest Bird in agricultural Landscapes near Ottawa, Canada. A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science Department of Biology Carleton University Ottawa. Ontario, 2001. 100 p.

Birds of the Soviet Union. T. 1, Pod red. G. P. Dement'eva i N. A. Gladkova. M.: Sov. nauka, 1951. 653 p.

Birds of the Soviet Union. T. 2, Pod red. G. P. Dement'eva i N. A. Gladkova. M.: Sov. nauka, 1951. 485 p.

Birds of the Soviet Union. T. 3, Pod red. G. P. Dement'eva i N. A. Gladkova. M.: Sov. nauka, 1951. 685 p.

Birds of the Soviet Union. T. 4, Pod red. G. P. Dement'eva i N. A. Gladkova. M.: Sov. nauka, 1952. 647 p.

Birds of the Soviet Union. T. 5, Pod red. G. P. Dement'eva i N. A. Gladkova. M.: Sov. nauka, 1954. 808 p.

Birds of the Soviet Union. T. 6, Pod red. G. P. Dement'eva i N. A. Gladkova. M.: Sov. nauka. 1954. 796 p.

Boecklen W. Nestedness, biogeographic theory, and the design of nature reserves, Oecologia. 1997. Vol. 112. P. 123–142.

Diamond J. M. Assembly of species communities, Ecology and evolution of communities. 1975. P. 342–444.

Gorchakovskiy P. L. Vegetation, Ural i Priural'e. M.: Nauka, 1968. P. 211–261.

Gotelli N. J., Ellison A. M. Assembly rules for New England ant assemblages, Oikos. 2002. Vol. 99. P. 591–599.

Gotelli N. J., Entsminger G. L. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology. Version 7.0. Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear. 2001. URL: http://homepages.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm.

Heino J., Soininen J., Alahuhta J., Lappalainen J., Virtanen R. Metacommunity ecology meets biogeography: effects of geographical region, spatial dynamics and environmental filtering on community structure in aquatic organisms, Oecologia. 2016. Vol. 183 (1). P. 121–137. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3750-y.

Koblik E. A. Red'kin Ya. A. Arhipov V. Yu. List of birds of the Russian Federation. M.: Tovarischestvo nauchnyh izdaniy KMK, 2006. 256 p.

Korovin V. A. Birds in the agricultural landscapes of the Urals. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2004. 504 p.

Leibold M. A., Holyoak M., Mouquet N., Amarasekare P., Chase J. M., Hoopes M. F., Holt R. D., Shurin J. B., Law R., Tilman D., Loreau M., Gonzalez A. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology, Ecology Letters. 2004. Vol. 7. P. 601–613.

Leibold M. A., Mikkelson G. M. Coherence, species turnover, and boundary clumping: elements of meta-community structure, Oikos. 2002. Vol. 97. P. 237–250.

Matthews T. J., Sheard C., Cottee-Jones H. E. W., Bregman T. P., Tobias J. A., Whittaker R. J. Ecological traits reveal functional nestedness of bird communities in habitat islands: a global survey, Oikos. 2015. Vol. 124. No. 7. P. 817–826.

Meynard C. N., Quinn J. F. Bird Metacommunities in temperature South American forest: vegetation structure, area and Climate effects, Ecology. 2008. Vol. 89 (4). P. 981–990.

Morrison L. W. Nestedness in insular floras: spatiotemporal variation and underlying mechanisms, Journal of Plant Ecology. 2013. Vol. 6 (6). P. 480–488.

Orlova V. V. Western Siberia. L.: Gidromet. izd-vo, 1962. 360 p.

Ozkan K., Svenning J, C., Jeppesen E. Environmental species sorting dominates forest-bird community assembly across scales, Journal of Animal Ecology. 2013. Vol. 82 (1). P. 266–274. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02019.x.

Patterson B. D., Atmar W. Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos, Heaney L. R., Patterson B. D. (eds). Island biogeography of mammals. London, Academic Press, 1986. P. 65–82.

Podani J., Schmera D. A comparative evaluation of pairwise nestedness measures, Ecography. 2012. Vol. 35. P. 001–012.

Popov S. V. Patterns of joint occurrence of species in bird communities on the border of the taiga and forest-steppe of the Trans-Urals, Vestnik Udmurtskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Biologiya. Nauki o Zemle. 2016. T. 31. Vyp. 3. P. 83–97.

Presley J. S., Higgins C. L., Lopez-Gonzalez C., Stevens R. D. Elements of metacommunity structure of Paraguayan bats: multiple gradients require analysis of multiple ordination axes, Oecologia. 2009. Vol. 160. P. 781–793. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-009-1341-x.

Presley S. J., Higgins C. L., Willig M. R. A comprehensive framework for the evaluation of metacommunity structure, Oikos. 2010. Vol. 119. P. 908–917.

Royan A., Reynolds S. J., Hannah D. M., Prudhomme C., Noble D. G., Sadler J. P. Shared environmental responses drive co-occurrence patterns in river bird communities, Ecography. 2016. Vol. 39. P. 733–742.

Sebastián-González E., Botella F., Paracuellos M., Sanchez-Zapata J. A. Processes driving temporal dynamics in the nested pattern of water bird communities, Acta Oecologica. 2010. Vol. 36. P. 160–165.

Sybertz J., Reich M. Assessing Climate Change Induced Turnover in Bird Communities Using Climatically Analogous Regions, Diversity. 2015. Vol. 7. P. 36–59.

Ulrich W. Turnover - a FORTRAN program for analysis of species associations. Version 1.1. 2012. URL: www.umk.pl/~ulrichw. Turnover.

Ulrich W., Almeida-Neto M., Gotelli N. G. A consumer’s guide to nestedness analysis, Oikos. 2009. Vol. 118. P. 3–17.

Vilmi A., Tolonen K. T., Karjalainen S. M., Heino J. Metacommunity structuring in a highly-connected aquatic system: effects of dispersal, abiotic environment and grazing pressure on microalgal guilds, Hydrobiologia. 2016. P. 1–16. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-016-3024-z.

Wang Y., Chen S., Ding P. Testing multiple assembly rule models in avian communities on islands of an inundated lake, Zhejiang Province, China, Journal of Biogeography. 2011. Vol. 38. P. 1330–1344.

Willig M. R., Presley S. J. Biodiversity and metacommunity structure of animals along altitudinal gradients in tropical montane forests, Journal of Tropical Ecology. 2015. P. 1–16. DOI: 10.1017/S0266467415000589.

Displays: 5152; Downloads: 1057;