| Issue № 4 |
Original research |
pdf-version |
Characteristics of hydrobiocenoses of water bodies in the Amazar river basin
| Afonina Ekaterina Yuryevna | PhD, Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 672002, Russian Federation, Chita, PO box 1032, kataf@mail.ru |
| Tashlykova Natalya Aleksandrovna | PhD, Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 672002, Chita, P.O. Box 1032, NatTash2005@yandex.ru |
|
Keywords: algae rotifers crustaceans species composition abundance biomass Amazar river basin |
Summary: Hydrobiological studies were carried out in the basin of the Amazar River in the natural areas: the middle and lower reaches of the Amazar River, tributaries of the Krestovaya and Bolshaya Chichatka as well as in the artificially created areas: a pulp and industrial combine reservoir and a fish-passing facility in May, August, October 2018, May, October 2019 and July 2021. A total of 85 algae taxa from 6 divisions were identified. They included 6 taxa of Cyanobacteria ranked below the genus, including Bacillariophyta – 45, Chrysophyta – 8, Dinophyta – 1, Charophyta – 8, Chlorophyta – 15 and Euglenophyta – 2 and 68 invertebrate species and varieties: Rotifera – 38 species and subspecies, Cladocera – 20 species and Copepoda – 10 ones. The low development of algoflora and meiofauna of watercourses with semi-mountainous and mountainous flow patterns also caused the poverty of plankton communities in the reservoir in the first year of its formation © Petrozavodsk State University |
Received on: 25 March 2021 Published on: 27 December 2022 | |
References
Afonina E. Yu. Zykova E. H. Species composition and quantitative indicators of rotifers and crustaceans of the middle and lower reaches of the Amazar River (Trans-Baikal Territory), Amurskiy zoologicheskiy zhurnal. 2019. T. XI, No. 2. P. 95–102. DOI: 10.33910/2686-9519-2019-11-2-95-102.
Agawin N. S. R., Duarte C. M., Agusti S. Nutrient and temperature control of the contribution pf picoplankton to phytoplankton biomass and production, Limnology and Oceanography. 2000. No. 45. P. 591–600.
Avakyan A. B. Saltankin V. P. Sharapov V. A. Reservoirs. M.: Mysl', 1987. 325 p.
Balushkina E. B. Vinberg G. G. The relationship between body weight and body length in planktonic animals, Obschie osnovy izucheniya vodnyh ekosistem, Pod red. G. G. Vinberga. L.: Nauka, 1979. P. 169–172.
Bell T., Kalff J. The contribution of picoplankton in marine and freshwater system of different tropic status and depth, Limnology and Oceanography. 2001. No. 46. P. 1243–1248.
Callieri C., Stockner J. G. Freshwater autotropic picophytoplankton: A review, Journal of Limnology. 2002. No. 6. P. 1–14.
Condie S. A., Bormans M. The influence of density stratification on particle settling, dispersion and population growth, Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1997. Vol. 187, No. 1. P. 65–75.
Descy J, P. Phytoplankton composition and dynamics in the river Meuse (Belgium), Archiv fur Hydrobiologie. 1987. Vol. 78. P. 225–245.
Diehl S. Phytoplankton, light, and nutrients in a gradient of mixing depths: Theory, Ecology. 2002. Vol. 83, No. 2. P. 386–398.
Ermolaeva N. I. Aquatic ecosystems. Features of the formation of zooplankton in reservoirs: Аnalytical review, GPNTB SO RAN. 2008. No. 88. P. 69.
Geography of the Trans-Baikal Territory: Textbook, Pod red. V. P. Kulakova. Chita: Ekspress-izdatel'stvo, 2009. 308 p.
Guiry M. D., Guiry G. M. AlgaeBase. URL: http://www.algaebase.org (data obrascheniya: 02.10.2018).
Huisman J. Population dynamics of light-limited phytoplankton: Microcosm experiments, Ecology. 1999. Vol. 80. P. 202–210.
Huisman J., Arrayas M., Ebert U., Sommeijer B. How do sinking phytoplankton species manage to persist?, American Naturalist. 2002. Vol. 159. P. 245–254.
Huisman J., Thi N. N. P., Karl D. M. Sommeijer B. Reduced mixing generates oscillations and chaos in the oceanic deep chlorophyll maximum, Nature. 2006. Vol. 439. P. 322–325.
Jäger C. G., Diehl S., Schmidt G. M. Influence of water‐column depth and mixing on phytoplankton biomass, community composition, and nutrients, Limnology and oceanography. 2008. Vol. 53, No. 6. P. 2361–2373.
Kazykina S. M. Zoobenthos community of the Amazar River in the area of the confluence of the Bolshaya Chichatka River, Kulaginskie chteniya: Tezisy XI Mezhdunar. nauch, prakt. konf. Chita: ZabGU, 2011. P. 137–139.
Keys to freshwater invertebrates in Russia and adjacent territories, Pod red. P. Ya. Calolihina. T. 2: Rakoobraznye. SPb.: Nauka, 1995. 632 c.
Kiselev I. A. Plankton in the seas and continental reservoirs. T. 1. L.: Nauka, 1969. 658 p.
Kiseleva V. A. Formation of the hydrobiological regime of the Ust-Kamenogorsk reservoir: Avtoref. dip. ... kand. biol. nauk. Alma-Ata, 1967. 23 p.
Krylov A. V. Mendsayhan B. Ayuushsuren Ch. Cvetkov A. I. Zooplankton of basal discharges of different-type reservoirs in the arid zone: the influence of the level regime and meteorological conditions, Transformaciya ekosistem. 2019. T. 2, No. 1. P. 59–74.
Kutikova L. A. Rotifers of the fauna of the USSR (Rotatoria). L.: Nauka, 1970. 744 p.
Matafonov D. V. Forecast of changes in the structure of benthic communities of the Amazar River in connection with the construction of the Amazar cellulose plant, Nauchnye osnovy ekologicheskogo monitoringa: Materialy Vserop. nauch, prakt. konf. Habarovsk: IVEP DVO RAN, 2005. P. 23.
Medvedeva L. A. Nikulina T. V. Sirotskiy S. E. Assessment of the state of the aquatic ecosystem of the Bureya reservoir according to the analysis of phytoplankton communities, Vodnye resursy. 2015. T. 42, No. 2. P. 199–211.
Muhutdinov V. F. Butakova E. A. Production characteristics of phytoplankton in the first years of the existence of the Yumaguzin reservoir, Biologiya vnutrennih vod. 2012. No. 4. P. 25–30.
O’Brien K. R., Ivey G. N., Hamilton D. P., Waite A. M., Visser P. M. Simple mixing criteria for the growth of negatively buoyant phytoplankton, Limnology and oceanography. 2003. Vol. 48. P. 1326–1337.
Piirsoo K., Pall P., Tuvikene A., Viik M. Temporal and spatial patterns of phytoplankton in a temperate lowland river (Emajõgi, Estonia), Journal of Plankton Research. 2008. Vol. 30, No. 11. P. 1285–1295.
Pirozhnikov P. L. State and prospects for the development of fisheries on lakes, rivers and reservoirs of the USSR, Rybnoe hozyaystvo vnutrennih vodoemov SSSR. M., 1963. 203 p.
Poleva A. O. Shkundina F. B. Phytoplankton of the Pavlovsk reservoir on the Ufa river, Vestnik OGU. 2008. No. 12. P. 15–19.
Popov P. A. To the forecast of the formation of the ichthyocenosis of the Evenk reservoir, Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya. 2009. T. 3, No. 15. P. 18–25.
Potapova M., Prygiel J., Whitton B. A., Bukowska J. Use of algae for monitoring rivers in Russia, Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers, III. Douai Agence de ĺEau Artois-Picardie, France, 1999. P. 96–101.
Ruttner-Kolisko A. Suggestions for biomass calculation of plankton rotifers. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Beihefte Ergebnisse der, Limnologie. 1977. Bd. 8. P. 71–76.
SR. Surface water resources of the USSR. Hydrological study, Pod red. P. D. Shabalina. T. 18. Dal'niy Vostok. Vyp. 1. Amur. L.: Gidrometeorologicheskoe izd-vo, 1966. 488 p.
Sadchikov A. P. Methods of studying freshwater phytoplankton. M.: Universitet i shkola, 2003. 157 p.
Saushkin Yu. G. Geographical science in the past, present and future. M.: Prosveschenie, 1980. 269 p.
Shipunov A. B. Baldin E. M. Volkova P. A. Korobeynikov A. I. Nazarova S. A. Petrov S. V. Sufiyanov V. G. Clear statistics, use R!. M.: DMK Press, 2014. 298 p.
Smirnov N. N. Chydoridae of the fauna of the world. (Novaya seriya, AN SSSR. Zool. in-t. Fauna SSSR. Rakoobraznye; No. 101; T. 1. Vyp. 2). L.: Nauka, 1971. 531 p.
Tashlykova N. A. Ecological features of phytoplankton development in the deltaic channels of the Selenga River and Cherkalovo Sor (Lake Baikal): Dip. ... kand. biol. nauk. Ulan-Ude, 2009. 207 p.
Vaynshteyn B. A. On the assessment of similarities between biocenoses, Biologiya, morfologiya i sistematika vodnyh organizmov. L.: Nauka, 1976. P. 156–164.
Visser P. M., Massut L., Huisman, J., Mur L. R. Sedimentation losses of Scenedesmus in relation to mixing depth, Arch. Hydrobiol. 1996. Vol. 136. P. 289–308.
WoRMS: World Register of Marine Species. 2022. URL: http://www.marinespecies.org (data obrascheniya: 18.11.2021).
Zamana L. V. Miheev I. E. Assessment of the impact of the projected Amazar reservoir on the ichthyofauna of the Upper Amur basin, Nauchnye osnovy ekologicheskogo monitoringa vodohranilisch: Materialy Vserop. nauch, prakt. konf. Habarovsk: IVEP DVO RAN, 2005. P. 135–138.
Zykova E. H. Zooplankton of the Amazar River in the area of the projected pulp mill, Kulaginskie chteniya: Tezisy XI Mezhdunar. nauch, prakt. konf. Chita: ZabGU, 2011. P. 135–137.
© 2011 - 2024
Petrozavodsk State University
technical support - RCNIT
The editor-in-chief - Andrey Korosov
ecopri@petrsu.ru