Sukhodolskaya R., Gordienko T., Vavilov D. Soil invertebrates of a large industrial center // Principy èkologii. 2018. № 2. P. 140‒149. DOI: 10.15393/

Issue № 2

Original research


Soil invertebrates of a large industrial center

Ph. D, Institute of Ecology Tatarstan AS,
   Tatyana Aleksandrovna
Institute of Ecology Tatarstan AS,
   Dmitriy Nikolaevich
Institute of Ecology Tatarstan AS,
industrial pollution
ground beetles
click beetles
Summary: We studied soil-dwelling invertebrates in Nizhnekamsk city, which is a large industrial center (Tatarstan Republic, Russia). The Industrial Complex of Nizhnekamsk is situated nearby – petrochemical industry enterprises aggregation. We investigated soil macrofauna in three zones: sanitary-protective (impact), suburbs of the city (recreational) and in the city itself (residential zone). We sampled animals at 16 plots (meadows, pineries, limes and birch-woods). Samples included 128 soil-zoological ones, 1813 individuals of 24 taxones were caught. The highest taxonomical biodiversity in pedobionts was in residential zone (21 taxones were recorded), it was lower in impact and recreational zones – 19 and 25 taxones, respectively. The invertebrate number varied considerably (from 52 till 518 individuals/m2). The highest macrofauna number occurred at the open and forested plots of residential zones (a. o. insects domination in the meadows and earthworms – in the forests). Macrofauna numbers in impact and recreational zones were similar and lower, than in residential one. Pedobionts biomass varied considerably as well (from 4.4 till 149.3 g/ m2) and was also larger in residential zone. Earthworms and click-beetles dominated in macrofauna. Lumbricids biodiversity was the highest in forest phytocenoses of impact and recreational zones (6 species in each). Click-beetles biodiversity was higher in the meadows of impact and residential zones. In general, the abundance of pedobionts in Nizhnekamsk was higher than in the natural pine and deciduous forests of the Republic of Tatarstan. That was apparently due to non-distinctive soil conditions in coniferous biotopes and the manifestation of the protective reaction of organisms to anthropogenic impact. The latter was confirmed by multivariate analysis results. It showed that macrofauna structure significantly differed only between impact and residential zones.

© Petrozavodsk State University

Received on: 11 January 2018
Published on: 25 June 2018


Beninde J., Veith M., Hochkirch A. Biodiversity in cities needs space: A meta‐analysis of factors determining intra‐urban biodiversity variation, Ecology letters. 2015. Vol. 18 (6). P. 581–592.

Bogyó D., Magura T., Simon E., Tóthmérész B. Millipede (Diplopoda) assemblages alter drastically by urbanization, Landscape and Urban Planning. 2015. Vol. 133. P. 118–126.

Borovikov B. STATISTICA: The art of analyzing data on computer. SPb., 2001. 656 p.

Cameron K. H., Leather S. R. How good are carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) as indicators of invertebrate abundance and order richness?, Biodiv. Conserv. 2012. Vol. 21. P. 763–779.

Degtyareva T. V. State of soil macrofauna in urban environment of Stavropol city, Izvestiya PGPU im. V. G. Belinskogo. 2011. No. 25. P. 345–349.

Eremeeva N. I. Athropodes macrofauna formation in conditions of urbanization, Izvestiya YuFU. Tehnicheskie nauki. 2011. No. 9 (122). P. 186–191.

Eremeeva N. I. Structure and ecological mechanisms of formation of the arthropods mesofauna in urbanized territories: by the example of Kemerovo. Kemerovo, 2006. 306 p.

Filimonova Zh. V. Gongal'skiy K. B. Assemblages of soil invertebrates on the border of areas with low and high pollution by Kosogorsky melting factory (Tula region), Izvestiya Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V. G. Belinskogo. 2011. No. 25. P. 472–477.

Ge B., Cheng H., Zheng X., Kong J., & Bao Y. Community structure and diversity of soil macrofauna from different urban greenbelts in Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province, Chinese Biodiversity. 2005. Vol. 13 (3). P. 197–203.

Gordienko T. A. Vavilov D. N. Suhodol'skaya R. A. influence of recreation on communities of soil mesofauna in forest park zone of Kazan, Povolzhskiy ekologicheskiy zhurnal. 2016. No. 2. P. 144–154.

Jinxia L., Mei H., Xiuqin Y. I. N., Jiliang L. I. U. Effects of the accumulation of the rare earth elements on soil macrofauna community, Journal of Rare Earths. 2010. Vol. 28 (6). P. 957–964.

McIntyre N. E., Rango J., Fagan W. F., Faeth S. H. Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment, Landsc. Urban Planning. 2001. Vol. 52. P. 257–274.

Ossola A., Hahs A. K., Nash M. A., Livesley S. J. Habitat complexity enhances comminution and decomposition processes in urban ecosystems, Ecosystems. 2016. Vol. 19 (5). P. 927–941.

Pontégnie M., de Warnaffe G. D. B., Lebrun P. Impacts of silvicultural practices on the structure of hemi-edaphic macrofauna community, Pedobiologia. 2005. Vol. 49 (3). P. 199–210.

Santos D. P., Schossler T. R., Santos I. L. D., Melo N. B., Santos G. G. Soil macrofauna in a Cerrado, Caatinga ecotone under different crops in Southwestern Piauí State, Brazil, Ciência Rural. 2017. Vol. 47 (10). P. 1–9.

Sassen S., Dotan N. Delegating, not returning, to the biosphere: How to use the multi-scalar and ecological properties of cities, Global Environmental Change. 2011. Vol. 21. P. 823–834.

Suhodol'skaya R. A. Gordienko T. A. Sabancev D. N. Assessment of state of soil biota in catchment area of Nizhnekamsk industrial complex, Ohrana prirodnoy sredy i ekologo-biologicheskoe obrazovanie: Materialy mezhdunar. nauchno-prakt. konf. Elabuga, 2015. P. 268–275.

Tantachasatid P., Boyer J., Thanisawanyankura S., Séguy L., & Sajjaphan K. Soil macrofauna communities under plant cover in a no-till system in Thailand, Agriculture and Natural Resources. 2017. Vol. 51 (1). P. 1–6.

Vershinina S. D. Soil macrofauna structure in gradient of urbanization, Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. 2011. Vyp. 2. P. 84–89.

Vorobeychik E. L. Ermakov A. I. Zolotarev M. P. Tuneva T. K. Alteration of diversity of soil macrofauna in gradient of industrial pollution, Russkiy entomologicheskiy zhurnal. 2012. T. 21. Vyp. 2. P. 203–218.

Vorobeychik E. L. Ermakov A. I. Soil macrofauna in forest ecosystems in conditions of big industrial city, Evraziatskiy entomologicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. T. 12. No. 6. P. 519–528.

Youngsteadt E., Henderson R. C., Savage A. M., Ernst A. F., Dunn R. R., Frank S. D. Habitat and species identity, not diversity, predict the extent of refuse consumption by urban arthropods, Global change biology. 2015. Vol. 21 (3). P. 1103–1115.

Zolotarev M. P., Belskaya E. A. Ground-dwelling invertebrates in a large industrial city: Differentiation of recreation and urbanization effects, Contemporary problems of ecology. 2015. Vol. 8 (1). P. 83–90.

Displays: 1207; Downloads: 264;