|Issue № 2||
|Ph.D., -, FSBI All-Russian Research Institute of Forest Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, firstname.lastname@example.org|
|-, -, FSBI All-Russian Research Institute of Forest Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, email@example.com|
Summary: Forest woody plants are an integral part of the ecological framework of large cities. The aim of the research was a comparative morphological and physiological-biochemical study of pine forest cultures from technogenically polluted (Voronezh, “Don” highway) and environmentally friendly territory (Voronezh region, Stupinsky test-object). We studied the distribution of variability between populations and within them by the traits of seed productivity (number and proportion of plump seeds per cone) and water regime (moisture deficiency, total moisture content, amount of colloid-bound water). It is shown that the range of variability of traits in the Stupino population is minimal. Seed efficiency of cones is high. Physiological and biochemical parameters, on the contrary, have lower modal values. This indicates that the population is in a state of dynamic equilibrium, which is characterized by stability and order. The “Moscovsky avenue” planting, on the contrary, has lower productivity, a wider response rate, and a high level of trait variability. Differences between the objects (with the exception of moisture content) are statistically significant. In optimal years, the amplitude of variability and types of structure transformation do not change, which confirms the stability of these vital states. The constancy of the traits indicates that the pine trees growing along the highway are a weak non-equilibrium system. We discuss the energy concept of plant adaptation, according to which the adaptation of a species to anthropogenic stress requires additional energy. To survive, plants are forced to switch to a less energy- consuming path of development. The non-equilibrium state provides a certain level of their stress resistance and at the same time leads to a decrease in the quality and productivity of pine forests and their seed progenies.
© Petrozavodsk State University
Received on: 11 February 2020
Published on: 23 June 2020
Bates L. S., Waldren R. P., Teare I. D. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies, Plant Soil. 1973. Vol. 39. No. 1. P. 205–207. DOI: 10.1007/BF00018060.
Brandt L., Levis A. D., Fahey R., Scott L., Darling L., Swanston C. A framework for adapting urban forests to climate change, Environment Science and Policy. 2016. Vol. 66. P. 393–402. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.005.
Chirkova T. V. Physiological basics of plant resistance. SPb.: SPbGU, 2002. 244 p.
Chudinova L. A. Orlova N. V. Physiology of plant resistance. Perm': Izd-vo Permskogo universiteta, 2006. 124 p.
Dorofeeva L. M. Individual variability of Scots pine by heat resistance, Issledovanie form vnutrividovoy izmenchivosti rasteniy. Sverdlovsk: IERiZh UNC AN SSSR, 1981. P. 81–90.
Forest ecosystems and atmospheric pollution, Pod red. A. K. Alekseeva. L.: Nauka, 1990. 200 p.
Gosteva S. R. Ecological safety of Russia and sustainable development, Vestnik TGTU. 2010. T. 16. No. 3. P. 704–718.
Grey G. W., Deneke F. J. Urban Forestry. 2nd Ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1986. 299 p.
Kizeev A. N. Zhirov V. K. Nikanov A. N. Impact of industrial emissions of Kola peninsula enterprises on pine assimilatory apparatus, Ekologiya cheloveka. 2009. No. 1. P. 9–14.
Klushevskaya E. S. Kuznecova N. F. The Scots pine draught tolerance assessment based on needle physiological indices, Lesovedenie. 2016. No. 3. P. 216–222.
Kurolap S. A. Klepikov O. V. Integral medical-ecological zoning as the basis of regional strategy for sustainable development of Voronezh region, Vestnik TGU. 2013. T. 18. Vyp. 2. P. 516–519.
Kuznecov V. V. Shevyakova N. I. Proline under stress: biological role, metabolism, regulation, Fiziologiya rasteniy. 1999. T. 46. No. 2. P. 321–336.
Kuznecova N. F. Mashkina O. S. Reaction on stress and its aftereffect in Scots pine during ontogenesis and when the generations change, Hvoynye boreal'noy zony. 2011. T. XXVIII. No. 1–2. P. 83–90.
Kuznetsova N. F., Semenov M. A., Sautkina M. Yu. Pine forests of East European plain, Pinus: Growth, Distribution and Uses. New York: Nova Science Publ., 2019. P. 1–47.
Pochinok H. N. Methods of biochemical analysis of plants, Metody issledovaniya vodnogo rezhima rasteniy. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1976. P. 318–324.
Prozherina N. A. Adaptation of conifers to the aero-technogenic pollution in the Arkhangelsk industrial agglomeration, Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal'nogo universiteta. Ser.: Estestvennye nauki. 2006. No. 2. P. 77–82.
Rautian A. S. On the nature of the genotype and heredity, Zhurnal obschey biologii. 1993. T. 54. No. 2. P. 13–148.
Verbruggen N., Hermans C. Proline accumulation in plants: a review, Amino Acids. 2008. No. 35. P. 753–759. DOI: 10.1007/s00726-008-0061-6.